Are the Tidal Volumes Used in Intensive Care Units Suitable for Lung Protective Ventilation? Can Training Ensure Compatibility?
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Research
P: 122-128
September 2020

Are the Tidal Volumes Used in Intensive Care Units Suitable for Lung Protective Ventilation? Can Training Ensure Compatibility?

J Turk Soc Intens Care 2020;18(3):122-128
1. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon AD, Yoğun Bakım Bilim Dalı, Bursa
2. Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Bursa Yüksek İhtisas Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon AD, Bursa
3. Sağlık Bakanlığı Bursa Devlet Hastanesi, Bursa
4. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Anabilim Dalı, Yoğun Bakım Bilim Dalı, Bursa, Türkiye
5. Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Bursa Yüksek İhtisas Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Kliniği, Bursa, Türkiye
6. Sağlık Bakanlığı Bursa Devlet Hastanesi, Bursa, Türkiye
7. T.C Bursa Şehir Hastanesi Yoğun Bakım Kliniği, Bursa,Türkiye
8. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Anabilim Dalı, Yoğun Bakım Bilim Dalı, Bursa, Türkiye
9. Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Bursa Yüksek İhtisas Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Kliniği, Bursa, Türkiye
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 20.12.2018
Accepted Date: 20.08.2019
Publish Date: 11.09.2020
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Objective:

Low tidal volume (VT) and lung protective ventilation (LPV) are recommended to prevent lung injury associated with invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). Present study aimed to determine the patients with risk of high VT application, whether VT calculated according ideal body weight (IBW) values are suitable for the recommended (6-8 mL/kg) and whether a questionnaire on the issue contributes to IMV suitable for LPV.

Materials and Methods:

Present study is conducted as a multicenter point - prevalence study in the intensive care units of three hospitals in Bursa. Non-ARDS patients receiving IMV and patients who were older than 18 years were included in the study. IMV parameters and demographic data of the patients were collected. Then, the physicians responsible of ventilatory management completed a questionnaire about LPV strategies and VT values required according to the IVA were shown. After 24 hours, mechanical ventilation parameters were re-collected. Body mass index (BMI), average tidal volume applied [VTmean = minute volume (MV)/respiratory rate (RR)] and VTmean for IBW (VTmean/IBW) values were calculated.

Results:

Fifty-six patients were included in the study. There were 33 male patients (58.9%) and the mean age of the patients was 65.43±18.87 years. The mean BMI of the patients was 27.84±7.0. The most commonly used ventilation mode was synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (75%). The VTmean was 549.32±151.00 mL (VTmean/IBW =9.31±3.07 mL/kg). According to VTmean/IBW, for the use of large VTs, being female (10.77±2.74 mL/kg) and having BMI ≥30 (10.82±3.80 mL/kg) posed significantly higher risk than being male (8.31±2.91 mL/kg) and having BMI <30 (8.67±2.47 mL/ kg) (p=0.002, p=0.015 respectively). The results showed a significant decrease (p=0.026) in VTmean/IBW (8.81±3.49 mL/kg) values after the physicians completed LPV questionnaire and were shown the VT values (predicted by IBW).

Conclusion:

VTmean/IBW values were found to be higher than 6-8 mL/kg, the recommended value for LPV. Ventilation with high VT was associated with female gender and having a BMI of ≥30. Completing the LPV questionnaire and seeing the VT values (predicted by IBW) contributed to the number of the patients ventilated with VT values suitable LPV.

Keywords: Lung protective ventilation, critically ill patient, mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit

References

1
Slutsky AS, Ranieri VM. Ventilator-induced lung injury. N Engl J Med 2013;369:2126-36.
2
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Netwok, Brower RG, Matthay MA, Schoenfeld D, Thompson BT, Wheeler A. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1301-8.
3
Determann RM, Royakkers A,Wolthuis EK, Vlaar AP, Choi G, Paulus F, et al. Ventilation with lover tidal volumes as compared with conventional tidal volumes for patients without acute lung injury: A preventive randomized controlled trial. Crit Care 2010;14:R1.
4
Neto AS, Simonis FD, Barbas CSV, Biehl M, Determann RM, Elmer J, et al. Lung-Protective ventilation with low tidal volumes and occurrance of pulmonary complications in patients without acute respitory distress syndrome: A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. Crit Care Med 2015;43:2155-63.
5
Gajic O, Dara SI, Mendez JL, Adesanya AO, Festic E, Caples SM, et al. Ventilator-associated lung injury in patients without acute lung injury at the onset of mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med 2004;32:1817-24.
6
Futier E, Constantin JM, Paugam-Burtz C, Pascal J, Eurin M, Neuschwander A, et al. A trial of intraoperative low-tidal-volume ventilation in abdominal surgery. N Engl J Med 2013;369:428-37.
7
Karalapillai D, Weinberg L, Galtieri J, Glassford N, Eastwood G, Darvall J, et al. Current ventilationpractice during general anaesthesia: A prospective audit in Melbourne, Australia. BMC Anesthesiology 2014;14;85.
8
Jaber S, Coisel Y, Chanques G, Futier F, Constantin JM, Michelet JM, et al. A multicentre observational study of intraoperative ventilatory management during general anesthesia:tidal volumes and relation to body weight. Anesthesia 2012;67:999-1008.
9
ARDSNet Studies. www.ardsnet.org/files/pbwtables_2005-02-02.pdf (Erişim tarihi: 28/11/2018).
10
Neto AS, Cardoso SO, Manetta JA, Parreira VG, Esposito DC, Pasquallucci Mde O, et al. Association between use of lung-protective ventilation with lower tidal volumes and clinical outcomes among patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2012;308:1651-9.
11
Neto AS, Barbas CSV, Simonis FD, Artigas-Raventos A, Canet J, Determann RM, et al. Epidemiological characteristics, practice of ventilation, and outcome in patients at risk of acute respiratory distress sydrome in intensive care units from 16 countries (PRoVENT): an international, multicentre, prospective study. Lancet Respir Med 2016;4:882-93.
12
Alencar R, D’Angelo V, Carmona R, Shultz JM. Patients with uninjured lungs may also benefit from lung-protective ventilator settings. F1000Res 2017;6:2040.
13
Pronovost PJ. Enhancing physicians use of clinical guidelines. JAMA 2013;310:2501-2.
14
Bourdeaux CP, Thomas MJ, Gould TH, Malhotra G, Jarvstad A, Jones T, et al. Increasing compliance with low tidal volume ventilation in the ICU with two nudge-based interventions: evaluation through intervention time-series analyses. BMJ Open 2016;6:e010129.
2024 ©️ Galenos Publishing House