Pain Assessment in Critically Ill Adult Patients: Validity and Reliability Research of the Turkish Version of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Article
P: 93-99
December 2016

Pain Assessment in Critically Ill Adult Patients: Validity and Reliability Research of the Turkish Version of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool

J Turk Soc Intens Care 2016;14(3):93-99
1. Ege Üniversitesi Tip Fakültesi Hastanesi, Anesteziyoloji Ve Reanimasyon Klinigi, Izmir, Türkiye
2. Katip Çelebi Üniversitesi Saglik Bilimleri Fakültesi, Hemsirelik Esaslari Anabilim Dali, Izmir, Türkiye
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 12.01.2016
Accepted Date: 23.06.2016
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Objective:

Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) and the Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS) are behavioral pain assessment scales for unconscious intensive care unit (ICU) patients. The aim is to determine the validation and reliability of the CPOT in Turkish in mechanically ventilated adult ICU patients.

Material and Method:

This prospective observational cohort study included 50 mechanically ventilated mixed ICU patients who were unable to report pain. CPOT and BPS was translated into Turkish and language validity was performed by ten intensive care specialists. Pain was assessed in the course of painless and painful routine care procedures using the CPOT and the BPS by a resident and an intensivist concomitantly. Tests reliability, interrater reliability, and validity of the CPOT and the BPS were evaluated.

Results:

The mean age was 57.4 years and the mean APACHE II score was 18.7. A total of 100 assessments were recorded from 50 patients using CPOT and BPS. Scores of CPOT and BPS during the painful procedures were both significantly higher than painless procedures. The agreement between CPOT and BPS during painful and painless stimuli was ranged as; sensitivity 66.7%-90.3%; specificity 89.7%-97.9%; kappa value 0.712-0.892. The agreement between resident and intensivist during painful and painless stimuli was ranged from 97% to 100% and the kappa value was between 0.904 and 1.0.

Conclusion:

The Turkish version of the CPOT showed good correlation with the BPS. Interrater reliability between resident and intensivist was good. The study showed that the Turkish version of BPS and CPOT are reliable and valid tools to assess pain in daily clinical practice for intubated and unconscious ICU patients who are mechanically ventilated.

Keywords:
Intensive care unit, pain, validity, reliability