Abstract

Objective:

Drug-drug interaction (DDI) is related with complications and diminished efficacy of medications throughout the treatment process. Intensive care units (ICU) involve patients who are at elevated risk of potential drug-drug interactions (pDDI).

Materials and Methods:

Here, we identified potential DDIs in similar patient groups in ICUs in Turkey. Invitations were sent to 20 hospitals in Turkey for a multicenter point prevalence study. Patient orders were determined for potential DDI using the Lexi Interact Online Interaction Checker software. Of 236 patients whose data were collected, patients <18 years of age, those <5 drugs in their drug order, and those with incomplete data were excluded. The remaining 194 patients were included in the study.

Results:

A total 684 pDDIs were detected, of which 92 (13.4%) were major, 531 (77.6%) were moderate, and 61 (9%) were minor interactions. There was at least one drug interaction in 159 (81.9%) patients. A notable disparity was observed in the quantity of drugs in the 159 patients with drug interactions and those in the 36 patients without drug interactions (p<0.001). A substantial correlation was detected between the quantity of medications and the incidence of interactions among patients experiencing drug interactions (p<0.001, r=0.707).

Conclusion:

No significant correlation was found between the length of stay in ICU and the number of drugs or the number of drug interactions (p=0.216, r=0.092; p=0.284, r=-0.080, respectively). The increased risk of pDDI due to the use of multiple drugs was observed in ICU patients.

Keywords: Drug interactions, intensive care unit, adverse drug reactions

References

  1. Mannheimer B, Eliasson E. Drug-drug interactions that reduce the formation of pharmacologically active metabolites: a poorly understood problem in clinical practice. J Intern Med 2010;268:540-8.
  2. Smithburger PL, Kane-Gill SL, Seybert AL. Drug-drug interactions in the medical intensive care unit: an assessment of frequency, severity and the medications involved. Int J Pharm Pract 2012;20:402-8.
  3. Fitzmaurice MG, Wong A, Akerberg H, Avramovska S, Smithburger PL, Buckley MS, et al. Evaluation of Potential Drug-Drug Interactions in Adults in the Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Drug Saf 2019;42:1035-44.
  4. Cullen DJ, Sweitzer BJ, Bates DW, Burdick E, Edmondson A, Leape LL. Preventable adverse drug events in hospitalized patients: a comparative study of intensive care and general care units. Crit Care Med 1997;25:1289-97.
  5. Kane-Gill SL, Kirisci L, Verrico MM, Rothschild JM. Analysis of risk factors for adverse drug events in critically ill patients*. Crit Care Med 2012;40:823-8.
  6. Plaza J, Alamo M, Torres P, Fuentes A, López F. Interacciones de medicamentos y eventos adversos en fármacos utilizados en una unidad de cuidados intensivos [Drug interactions and adverse events induced by drugs used in an intensive care unit]. Rev Med Chil 2010;138:452-60.
  7. Ray S, Pramanik J, Bhattacharyya M, Todi S. Prospective observational evaluation of incidences and implications of drug-drug interactions induced adverse drug reactions in critically ill patients. Indian J Pharm Sci 2010;72:787-92.
  8. Wagh BR, Godbole DD, Deshmukh SS, Iyer S, Deshpande PR. Identification and Assessment of Potential Drug-Drug Interactions in Intensive Care Unit Patients. Indian J Crit Care Med 2019;23:170-4.
  9. Moura C, Prado N, Acurcio F. Potential drug-drug interactions associated with prolonged stays in the intensive care unit: a retrospective cohort study. Clin Drug Investig 2011;31:309-16.
  10. Acharya S, Ragam AS, Holla R, Yennagudda A. Prevalence of Potential Drug-Drug Interactions in the Intensive Care Unit of a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of Young Pharmacists 2019;11:197-201.
  11. Rivkin A. Admissions to a medical intensive care unit related to adverse drug reactions. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2007;64:1840-3.
  12. Amkreutz J, Koch A, Buendgens L, Muehlfeld A, Trautwein C, Eisert A. Prevalence and nature of potential drug-drug interactions among kidney transplant patients in a German intensive care unit. Int J Clin Pharm 2017;39:1128-39.
  13. Vanham D, Spinewine A, Hantson P, Wittebole X, Wouters D, Sneyers B. Drug-drug interactions in the intensive care unit: Do they really matter? J Crit Care 2017;38:97-103.
  14. Hammes JA, Pfuetzenreiter F, Silveira Fd, Koenig A, Westphal GA. Potential drug interactions prevalence in intensive care units. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva 2008;20:349-54.
  15. Abarca J, Malone DC, Armstrong EP, Grizzle AJ, Hansten PD, Van Bergen RC, et al. Concordance of severity ratings provided in four drug interaction compendia. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2004;44:136-41.
  16. Gülçebi İdriz Oğlu M, Küçükibrahimoğlu E, Karaalp A, Sarikaya Ö, Demirkapu M, Onat F, et al. Potential drug-drug interactions in a medical intensive care unit of a university hospital. Turk J Med Sci 2016;46:812-9.
  17. Bertsche T, Pfaff J, Schiller P, Kaltschmidt J, Pruszydlo MG, Stremmel W, et al. Prevention of adverse drug reactions in intensive care patients by personal intervention based on an electronic clinical decision support system. Intensive Care Med 2010;36:665-72.
  18. Smithburger PL, Kane-Gill SL, Seybert AL. Drug-drug interactions in cardiac and cardiothoracic intensive care units: an analysis of patients in an academic medical centre in the US. Drug Saf 2010;33:879-88.
  19. Rodrigues AT, Stahlschmidt R, Granja S, Pilger D, Falcao ALE, Mazzola PG. Prevalence of potential drug-drug interactions in the intensive care unit of a Brazilian teaching hospital. Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2017;53:1-8.
  20. Hasnain H, Ali H, Zafar F, Sial AA, Alam S, Beg AE, et al. Incidence of drug interactions in intensive care units in tertiary care settings: Classification, facts and measures. Pak J Pharm Sci 2018;31:669-75.

How to cite?

1.
Gülen D, Dağdelen MŞ, Ceylan İ, Kelebek Girgin N. Potential Drug-drug Interactions in Intensive Care Units in Turkey: A Point Prevalence Study. Turk J Intensive Care. 2023;21(2):93-99. https://doi.org/10.4274/tybd.galenos.2022.32932