Abstract

Objective:

The objectives of this study are to determine the problems of patients who underwent percutaneous tracheostomy opening in intensive care and then were discharged with a tracheostomy that had either spontaneous respiration or mechanical ventilation (MV) support, and decrease the morbidity and mortality of these patients by focusing on training their caregivers about potential problems.

Materials and Methods:

The files of 90 patients, who were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) between 2017 and 2018 with a tracheostomy, were analysed. Twenty-nine patients were discharged. Patients were grouped as cerebrovascular disease (CVD), respiratory failure (RF), neuromuscular diseases and others (Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s). Patients and their caregivers were interviewed face-to-face or by telephone to obtain information about patients. The reasons for hospitalisation, Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score, feeding patterns, MV support, life expectancy and problems at home were recorded.

Results:

In 29 discharged patients, 14 of them were classified as CVD, five as RF, six as neuromuscular disease (NMD) and four as other. The mortality rates of patients with high GCS values (GCS-2) from ICU were found to be lower. The fatality rate for the NMD group (0%) was found to be significantly lower than that of CVD (64.3%) and RF (80%). Seven (50%) patients developed contracture or limited joint motion. Respiratory-related problems were the most common problems that patients experienced at home, and 12 (85.7%) had intense secretions. Constipation was the most common nutritional problem and was experienced by six patients (42.9%).

Conclusion:

The home care of patients with a tracheostomy requires specific procedures and may lead to the development of specific complications. In this study, we determined that the respiratory problems of home care patients, particularly those involving intense secretions, plugged the tracheostomy and required the need for MV. Another important problem is that patients have limited joint motion. Thus, before discharge, patients should be trained consistently.

Keywords: Tracheostomy, patient treatment, mechanical ventilation

References

  1. Doğan R, Başaran B, Pınar HU, Arslan M. To evaluate the clinical outcome in patients discharged for home care with tracheostomy. J Turk Soc Intensive Care 2011;9:99-102.
  2. Nakarada-Kordic I, Patterson N, Wrapson J, Reay SD. A systematic review of patient and caregiver experiences with a tracheostomy. Patient 2018;11:175-91.
  3. Akenroye MI, Osukoya AT. Permanent tracheostomy: Its social impacts and their management in Ondo State, Southwest, Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract 2013;16:54-8.
  4. AP Gratrix, EL Graves, PG Murphy Complications associated with the use of temporary tracheostomies: an ill-defined problem? J Intensive Care Soc 2008;9:141-4.
  5. Bowers B, Scase C. Tracheostomy: facilitating discharge from hospital to home. Br J Nurs 2007;16:476-9.
  6. Cobb S. Presidential Address-1976. Social support as a moderator of life stress. Psychosom Med 1976;38:300-14.
  7. Make BJ, Hill NS, Goldberg AI, Bach JR, Criner GJ, Dunne PE, et al. Mechanical ventilation beyond the intensive care unit. Report of consensus conference of the American College of Chest Physicians. Chest 1998;113(Suppl 5):289S-344.
  8. MacIntyre NR, Cook DJ, Ely EW Jr, Epstein SK, Fink JB, Heffner JE, et al. Evidence-based guidelines for weaning and discontinuing ventilatory support: a collective task force facilitated by the American College of Chest Physicians; the American Association for Respiratory Care; and the American College of Critical Care Medicine. Chest 2001;120(Suppl 6):375s-95.
  9. Brook AD, Sherman G, Malen J, Kolleff MH. Early versus late tracheostomy in patient who require prolonged mechanical ventilation. Am J Crit Care 2000;9:352-9.
  10. Garrubba M, Turner T, Grieveson C. Multidisciplinary care for tracheostomy patients: a systematic review. Crit Care 200913:R177.
  11. de Mestral C, Iqbal S, Fong N, Le Blanc J, Fata P, Razek T, et al. Impact of a specialized multidisciplinary tracheostomy team on tracheostomy care in critically ill patients. Can J Surg 2011;54:167-72.
  12. Marchese S, Corrado A, Scala R, Corrao S, Ambrosino N. Tracheostomy in patients with long- term mechanical ventilation: a survey. Respir Med 2010;104:749-53.
  13. Marchese S, Lo Coco D, Lo Coco A. Outcome and attitudes toward home tracheostomy ventilation of consecutive patients: a 10-year experience. Respir Med 2008;102:430-6.
  14. Golestanian E, Liou JI, Smith MA. Long-term survival in older critically ill patients with acute ischemic stroke. Crit Care Med 2009;37:3107-13.
  15. Morris L, Lupei M, Afifi S. Perception of body image after tracheostomy. Crit Care Med 2013;41:A207-8.
  16. Evans R, Catapano M, Brooks D, Goldstein R, Avendano M. Family caregivers perspectives on caring for ventilator-assisted individuals at home. Can Respir J 2012;19:373-9.
  17. van Kesteren RG, Velthius B, van Leyden LW. Psychosocial problems arising from home ventilation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001;80:439-46.
  18. Wilson EB, Malley N. Discharge planning for the patient with a new tracheostomy Crit Care Nurse 1990;10:73-9.
  19. Paul F. Tracheostomy care and management in general wards and community settings: literature review. Nurs Critic Care 2010;15:76-85.

Copyright and license

Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to cite?

1.
Sari A, Ekinci O. Evaluation of the Clinical Course in Patients Discharged with Tracheostomy. Turk J Intensive Care. 2020;18(4):181-188. https://doi.org/10.4274/tybd.galenos.2019.96658